Newman Error Analysis Siswa Madrasah dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Matematika
Students’ mistakes in solving the mathematical word problem is still a problem so it must be identified for each stage of solving. It is done so that the solutions offered are more effective. One way to identify the stage of solving of mathematical problem is the Newman Error Analysis stage. So the purpose of this research is to describe the ability of students of Islamic Junior High School to solve mathematical problems in the form of word problem and to describe the mistakes of high-ability Islamic High School students in mathematical word problem based on Newman Error Analysis. The approach used is qualitative descriptive. The research subject is the high-ability in Islamic Junior High School of Jambi City. Students are asked to work on solving questions in the form of word problems. Then the student interviewed about the mistakes that were made when solving the word problems given for each of the stages. The results showed 56% of high-ability students encountered an error while solving the algebra operation and 44% of high-ability students encountered an error while solving Pythagoras theorem. As for the errors that occur in high-ability students if in the analysis based on the stage of Newman Error Analysis occurs at the stage of understanding the problem (comprehension) and the problem transformation (transformation). Of course, errors in the comprehension and transformation cause errors at a later stage so that the solution or answer found is worth wrong.
Keywords: Error, Newman Error Analysis, Mathematical Word Problem.
Aiken, L. R. (1972). Language factors in learning mathematics. Review of Educational Research, 42, 359-385.
A.L. White. (2005). Learning Mathematics in Classroom: Finding Out Why Children Make Mistakes-and then Doing Something to Help Them. Sydney: Universitty of Western Sydney.
A.L. White. (2010). Numeracy, Literacy, and Newman’s Error Analysis. Journal of Sciences and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, 33 (2), 129-148.
B, Sahar & AT, Rohani. (2010). Assessing Cognitive and Metacognitive Strategies during Algebra Problem Solving Among University Students. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8, 403-410.
Creswell. (2012). Educational Research “Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Amerika: Pearson.
D, Setyono & S, Sutarni. (2013). Kesalahan Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika dalam Bentuk Soal Cerita Pokok Bahasan Aritmetika Sosial. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika, Surakarta.
Kane, R. B., Byrne, M. A., & Hater, M. A. (1974). Helping children read mathematics. New York: American Book.
L.S. Shulman. (1970). Psychology and Mathematics Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press Chicago.
NCTM. (2000). Principles and Standarts for School Mathematics. Reston: VA.
Pippig, G. (1977). Psychologische tIberlegungen zur Uiberwindung von denkfehlern. Mathematik in der Schule, 15, 26-41.
Radatz, H. (2013). Error Analysis in Mathematic Education. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 10 (3), 163-172.
Sajadi M, Amiripour P, & Malkhalifeh M.R. (2013). The Examining Mathematical Word Problems Solving Ability under Efficient Representation Aspec. Mathematics Education Trends and Research, 1-11.
Tello, E.A. (2010). Making Mathematics Word Problems Reliable Measures of Student Mathematics Abilities. Journal of The Mathematics Education, 3 (1), 15-26.
Copyright (c) 2019 Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.