Newman’s Error Analysis Dalam Geometri Ruang Ditinjau dari Kecerdasan Visual Siswa SMA

Main Article Content

Ardina Fahriyanti Maharani
Erlina Prihatnani

Abstract

In solid geometry needed the ability to visualize space that cannot be seen so differences in visual intelligence can trigger errors in solving geometry problems. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the types of errors made by students and the factors that cause errors in working on geometry problems based on Newman's Error Analysis (NEA) in terms of visual intelligence. This research chose the subjects of class XII high school who had studied the material distance points to lines in space with different levels of visual intelligence, namely high and low. The process of collecting data used visual intelligence test questions, geometry test questions, and interviews. The results of this study indicated that the level of students' visual intelligence affects the difference in location and the factor that causes errors in the stage of transformation especially on determining the distance in dimension 3. Students with high visual intelligence made mistakes at the stage of transformation and encoding that caused by the students’ carelessness. However, students with low visual intelligence made mistakes at the stage of comprehension, transformation, process skills, and encoding due to the concept of the point distance to the line and the concept of the Pythagorean theorem.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

References

Campbell Linda, Bruce Campbell, dan D. D. (2002). Metode baru Melesatkan Kecerdasan. Depok: Inisasi Press.
Farida, N. (2015). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa SMP Kelas VIII dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Soal Cerita Matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika FKIP Univ. Muhammadiyah Metro, 4(2), 42–52.
Gardner, H. (2003). Multiple Intelligences. Batam: Interaksara.
Isran. (2017). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Tes Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Materi Fungsi Eksponen dengan Panduan Kriteria Watson. Kontinu: Jurnal Penelitian Didaktik Matematika, 1(1), 30–37.
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 24 Tahun 2016 Lampiran 16 Tentang Kompetensi Inti dan Kompetensi Dasar SMA/MA/SMK (2016).
Mulyadi, Riyadi, & S. S. (2015). Cerita Pada Materi Luas Permukaan Bangun Ruang Berdasarkan Newman’s Error Analysis (NEA) Ditinjau Dari Kemampuan Spasial. Jurnal Elektronik Pembelajaran Matematika, 3(4), 370–382.
Pateda, M. (1989). Analisis Kesalahan. Flores: Nusa Indah.
Puspendik. (n.d.). Daya Serap Indikator Materi Geometri dan Trigonometri UN SMA IPA Tahun Pelajaran 2017/2018. Retrieved from http://puspendik.kemdikbud.go.id/hasil-un/
Prakitipong, N., & Nakamura, S. (2006). Analysis of Mathematics Performance of Grade Five Students in Thailand Using Newman Procedure. Journal of International Cooperation in Education, 9(1), 111–122.
Prihatnani, E. (2016). Prestasi Belajar Matematika Siswa Sman Kabupaten Kulon Progo Dalam Pembelajaran Menggunakan Model Tgt Berbantuan Alat Peraga Ditinjau Dari Kecerdasan Spasial. Scholaria : Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 6(2), 29–45.
Singh, P., Abdul, A., & Sian, T. (2010). The Newman Procedure for Analyzing Primary Four Pupils Errors on Written Mathematical Tasks : A Malaysian Perspective. International Conference on Mathematics Education Research 2010 (ICMER 2010), 8(5), 264–271.
Sulthon. (2019). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Sains Berbasis Pemanfaatan Barang-barang Bekas dari Lingkungan Sekitar bagi Siswa Madrasah Ibtidaiyah (MI) di Daerah Pinggiran Kota Kabupaten Kudus. Jurnal Keilmuan Dan Kependidikan Dasar, 11(01), 17–26.
Yaumi, M. (2012). Pembelajaran Berbasis Multiple Intelligences. Jakarta: Dian Rakyat.
White, A. L. (2010). Numeracy , Literacy and Newman ’ s Error Analysis. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, 33(2), 129–148.