Tingkat Kesalahan Siswa Menurut Kriteria Newman Ditinjau dari Jenjang Pendidikan dan Bidang Fokus Soal Matematika
Keywords:
Kesalahan Siswa, Kriteria Newman, Jenjang Pendidikan, Bidang Matematika
Abstract
Banyaknya siswa yang mengalami kesulitan dalam menyelesaikan soal matematika pada jenjang sekolah dasar hingga sekolah menengah atas menjadi perhatian khusus dalam proses pembelajran. Pentingnya menganalisis kembali hasil-hasil penelitian yang berkaitan dengan kesalahan siswa khususnya menurut kriteria Newman menjadi dasar untuk melakukan perbaikan dalam proses pembelajaran. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan menggunakan metode meta-analisis dengan cara menganalisis data dari penelitian-penelitian sebelumnya yang bersumber database pengindek baik nasional maupun internasional. Hasil analisis data menggunakan software JASP berdasarkan dari 58 data yang sesuai kriteria kelayakan diperoleh informasi bahwa siswa paling banyak melakukan kesalahan penulisan jawaban akhir (encoding errors) dengan persentase sebesar 46% (artinya: 54% sudah menjawab benar). Dari lima indikator tersebut terlihat bahwa menulis jawaban akhir (encoding errors) merupakan paling sering dilakukan seperti di jenjang SD sebesar 44%, SMP sebesar 56%, dan SMA sebesar 34%. Kemudian berdasarkan bidang fokus aljabar dan statistika, siswa paling banyak melakukan kesalahan menulis jawaban akhir (encoding errors) yakni sebesar 50% dan 35%, sedangkan pada bidang geometri siswa paling banyak melakukan kesalahan pada indikator transformasi (transformation) dan melakukan perhitungan (process skill error) dengan persentase sebesar 49%.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Abdullah, A. H., Abidin, N. L. Z., & Ali, M. (2015). Analysis of students’ errors in solving Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) problems for the topic of fraction. Asian Social Science, 11(21), 133–142. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n21p133
Aini, S. D., & Irawati, S. (2022). Analysis of Student Errors in Solving Non Homogeneous Differential Equations Problems Based on Kastolan Stages. JTAM (Jurnal Teori Dan Aplikasi Matematika), 6(1), 93–105. https://doi.org/10.31764/jtam.v6i1.5558
Budi, B. S., & Nusantara, T. (2020). Analisis kesalahan Newman siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal nilai mutlak dan scaffolding-nya. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Undiksha, 11(2), 69–78.
Chiphambo, S. M., & Mtsi, N. (2021). Exploring Grade 8 Students’ Errors When Learning About the Surface Area of Prisms. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(8), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.29333/EJMSTE/10994
Dinni, H. N. (2018). HOTS ( High Order Thinking Skills ) dan Kaitannya dengan Kemampuan Literasi Matematika. Prisma, 1, 170–176.
Gradini, E., Firmansyah, F., & Noviani, J. (2018). Menakar Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Calon Guru Matematika Melalui Level Hots Marzano. Eduma : Mathematics Education Learning and Teaching, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.24235/eduma.v7i2.3357
Hodiyanto, H. (2017). Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. AdMathEdu : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, Ilmu Matematika Dan Matematika Terapan, 7(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.12928/admathedu.v7i1.7397
Hunaifi, H., & Darhim, D. (2020). Students Error Analysis in Solving Mathematical Communication Problems of Square and Triangle Material For 7th Grade Based On Watson Criteria. International Conference on Elementary ….
Karpova, M., Shmelev, V., & Dukhanov, A. (2015). An automation of the course design with use of learning objects with evaluation based on the Bloom taxonomy. 9th International Conference on Application of Information and Communication Technologies, AICT 2015 - Proceedings, 138–142. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAICT.2015.7338533
Kizlik, B. (2012). Measurement , Assessment , and Evaluation in Education. FGS, UiTM, 1–43.
Kotze, H. (2018). Competencies in mathematical modelling tasks: An error analysis. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(8). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/91922
Kristianti, L. W., & Retnawati, H. (2020). An analysis of students’ error in completing the contextual problems based on Newman's procedure. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1511(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1511/1/012036
Musyadad, M. A., & Martadiputra, B. A. P. (2021). Error type analysis based on
Newman’s theory in solving mathematical communication ability of junior high school students on the material of polyhedron. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1806(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012097
Ningrum, Y., Kusmayadi, T. A., & Fitriana, L. (2019). Analysis problem solving about contextual problem of algebraic in junior high school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1211(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1211/1/012102
Oktafia, M., Putra, A., & Habibi, M. (2020). The Analysis of Students’ Error in Operation Reseach Test for Linear Program Topic Based on Newman’s Error Analysis (NEA). Edumatika : Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2), 103. https://doi.org/10.32939/ejrpm.v3i2.591
Pedai, S. S., Sulistiawati, & Arifin, S. (2021). The identification of students’ mistakes on mathematical communication ability in three-dimensional shapes of geometry: Cube and cuboid. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2331. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0041649
Pereira, D., Flores, M. A., & Niklasson, L. (2016). Assessment revisited: a review of research in Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(7), 1008–1032. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1055233
Putri, S. M. (2019). Identifikasi Kesalahan Siswa Berdasarkan Newman Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Pada Materi Persamaan Kuadrat Tingkat Sekolah Menengah Pertama. JURNAL SILOGISME : Kajian Ilmu Matematika Dan Pembelajarannya, 4(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.24269/silogisme.v4i1.1368
Rohmah, M., & Sutiarso, S. (2018). Analysis problem solving in mathematical using theory Newman. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(2), 671–681. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/80630
Rosli, S., Shahrill, M., & Yusof, J. (2020). Applying the hybrid strategy in solving mathematical word problems at the elementary school level. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 10(2), 216–230. https://doi.org/10.3926/JOTSE.965
Shinariko, L. J., Saputri, N. W., Hartono, Y., & Araiku, J. (2020). Analysis of students’ mistakes in solving mathematics olympiad problems. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1480(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1480/1/012039
Son, A. L., Darhim, & Fatimah, S. (2019). An analysis to student error of algebraic problem solving based on polya and newman theory. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1315(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1315/1/012069
Sovia, A., & Herman, T. (2019). Slow learner errors analysis in solving integer problems in elementary school. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 14(3), 1281–1288.
Sudiono, E. (2017). Analisis Kesalahan Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika Materi Persamaan Garis Lurus Berasarkan Analisis Newman. UNION: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 5(3), 295–302. https://doi.org/10.30738/.v5i3.1282
Sukoriyanto, S., Desmayanti, N., & Desmayanti, N. (2021). Analysis of student
errors in solving linear programming problems based on Newman’s procedures in terms of writing mathematical communication capabilities. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2330. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0043383
Suryati, N., & Subanji, S. (2016). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Open Ended Berdasarkan Teori Newman. Al Hikmah: Journal of Education, 2(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.54168/ahje.v2i1.28
Susanti, N., Juandi, D., & Tamur, M. (2020). The Effect of Problem-Based Learning (PBL) Model On Mathematical Communication Skills of Junior High School Students – A Meta-Analysis Study. JTAM (Jurnal Teori Dan Aplikasi Matematika), 4(2), 145. https://doi.org/10.31764/jtam.v4i2.2481
Syaharuddin, Mulyono, S., Utami, R. R., Ghazali, M., Yustitia, V., Nurhayati, & Merdekawaty, A. (2021). Penelitian Meta Analisis Menggunakan Software JASP: Pengumpulan Data Sampai Publikasinya. Pena Persada.
Tayeb, T., Angriani, A. D., Humaerah, S. R., Sulasteri, S., & Rasyid, M. R. (2018). The Students’ Errors in Answering Geometric Tests with Newman Procedures. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1114(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1114/1/012048
Triliana, T., & Asih, E. C. M. (2019). Analysis of students’ errors in solving probability based on Newman's error analysis. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1211(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1211/1/012061
Umar, W. (2012). Membangun Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Infinity Journal, 1(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v1i1.2.
Aini, S. D., & Irawati, S. (2022). Analysis of Student Errors in Solving Non Homogeneous Differential Equations Problems Based on Kastolan Stages. JTAM (Jurnal Teori Dan Aplikasi Matematika), 6(1), 93–105. https://doi.org/10.31764/jtam.v6i1.5558
Budi, B. S., & Nusantara, T. (2020). Analisis kesalahan Newman siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal nilai mutlak dan scaffolding-nya. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Undiksha, 11(2), 69–78.
Chiphambo, S. M., & Mtsi, N. (2021). Exploring Grade 8 Students’ Errors When Learning About the Surface Area of Prisms. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(8), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.29333/EJMSTE/10994
Dinni, H. N. (2018). HOTS ( High Order Thinking Skills ) dan Kaitannya dengan Kemampuan Literasi Matematika. Prisma, 1, 170–176.
Gradini, E., Firmansyah, F., & Noviani, J. (2018). Menakar Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Calon Guru Matematika Melalui Level Hots Marzano. Eduma : Mathematics Education Learning and Teaching, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.24235/eduma.v7i2.3357
Hodiyanto, H. (2017). Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. AdMathEdu : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, Ilmu Matematika Dan Matematika Terapan, 7(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.12928/admathedu.v7i1.7397
Hunaifi, H., & Darhim, D. (2020). Students Error Analysis in Solving Mathematical Communication Problems of Square and Triangle Material For 7th Grade Based On Watson Criteria. International Conference on Elementary ….
Karpova, M., Shmelev, V., & Dukhanov, A. (2015). An automation of the course design with use of learning objects with evaluation based on the Bloom taxonomy. 9th International Conference on Application of Information and Communication Technologies, AICT 2015 - Proceedings, 138–142. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAICT.2015.7338533
Kizlik, B. (2012). Measurement , Assessment , and Evaluation in Education. FGS, UiTM, 1–43.
Kotze, H. (2018). Competencies in mathematical modelling tasks: An error analysis. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(8). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/91922
Kristianti, L. W., & Retnawati, H. (2020). An analysis of students’ error in completing the contextual problems based on Newman's procedure. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1511(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1511/1/012036
Musyadad, M. A., & Martadiputra, B. A. P. (2021). Error type analysis based on
Newman’s theory in solving mathematical communication ability of junior high school students on the material of polyhedron. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1806(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012097
Ningrum, Y., Kusmayadi, T. A., & Fitriana, L. (2019). Analysis problem solving about contextual problem of algebraic in junior high school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1211(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1211/1/012102
Oktafia, M., Putra, A., & Habibi, M. (2020). The Analysis of Students’ Error in Operation Reseach Test for Linear Program Topic Based on Newman’s Error Analysis (NEA). Edumatika : Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2), 103. https://doi.org/10.32939/ejrpm.v3i2.591
Pedai, S. S., Sulistiawati, & Arifin, S. (2021). The identification of students’ mistakes on mathematical communication ability in three-dimensional shapes of geometry: Cube and cuboid. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2331. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0041649
Pereira, D., Flores, M. A., & Niklasson, L. (2016). Assessment revisited: a review of research in Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(7), 1008–1032. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1055233
Putri, S. M. (2019). Identifikasi Kesalahan Siswa Berdasarkan Newman Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Pada Materi Persamaan Kuadrat Tingkat Sekolah Menengah Pertama. JURNAL SILOGISME : Kajian Ilmu Matematika Dan Pembelajarannya, 4(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.24269/silogisme.v4i1.1368
Rohmah, M., & Sutiarso, S. (2018). Analysis problem solving in mathematical using theory Newman. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(2), 671–681. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/80630
Rosli, S., Shahrill, M., & Yusof, J. (2020). Applying the hybrid strategy in solving mathematical word problems at the elementary school level. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 10(2), 216–230. https://doi.org/10.3926/JOTSE.965
Shinariko, L. J., Saputri, N. W., Hartono, Y., & Araiku, J. (2020). Analysis of students’ mistakes in solving mathematics olympiad problems. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1480(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1480/1/012039
Son, A. L., Darhim, & Fatimah, S. (2019). An analysis to student error of algebraic problem solving based on polya and newman theory. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1315(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1315/1/012069
Sovia, A., & Herman, T. (2019). Slow learner errors analysis in solving integer problems in elementary school. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 14(3), 1281–1288.
Sudiono, E. (2017). Analisis Kesalahan Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika Materi Persamaan Garis Lurus Berasarkan Analisis Newman. UNION: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 5(3), 295–302. https://doi.org/10.30738/.v5i3.1282
Sukoriyanto, S., Desmayanti, N., & Desmayanti, N. (2021). Analysis of student
errors in solving linear programming problems based on Newman’s procedures in terms of writing mathematical communication capabilities. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2330. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0043383
Suryati, N., & Subanji, S. (2016). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Open Ended Berdasarkan Teori Newman. Al Hikmah: Journal of Education, 2(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.54168/ahje.v2i1.28
Susanti, N., Juandi, D., & Tamur, M. (2020). The Effect of Problem-Based Learning (PBL) Model On Mathematical Communication Skills of Junior High School Students – A Meta-Analysis Study. JTAM (Jurnal Teori Dan Aplikasi Matematika), 4(2), 145. https://doi.org/10.31764/jtam.v4i2.2481
Syaharuddin, Mulyono, S., Utami, R. R., Ghazali, M., Yustitia, V., Nurhayati, & Merdekawaty, A. (2021). Penelitian Meta Analisis Menggunakan Software JASP: Pengumpulan Data Sampai Publikasinya. Pena Persada.
Tayeb, T., Angriani, A. D., Humaerah, S. R., Sulasteri, S., & Rasyid, M. R. (2018). The Students’ Errors in Answering Geometric Tests with Newman Procedures. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1114(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1114/1/012048
Triliana, T., & Asih, E. C. M. (2019). Analysis of students’ errors in solving probability based on Newman's error analysis. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1211(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1211/1/012061
Umar, W. (2012). Membangun Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Infinity Journal, 1(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v1i1.2.
Published
2022-06-11
How to Cite
Mandailina, V., Putri, D., Abdillah, A., Syaharuddin, S., & Mahsup, M. (2022). Tingkat Kesalahan Siswa Menurut Kriteria Newman Ditinjau dari Jenjang Pendidikan dan Bidang Fokus Soal Matematika. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 1761-1775. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v6i2.1385
Section
Articles
Copyright (c) 2022 Vera Mandailina, Dwi Noorma Putri, Abdillah Abdillah, Syaharuddin Syaharuddin, Mahsup Mahsup
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
