Analisis Commognitive Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Lingkaran Ditinjau Dari Gaya Belajar
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan commognitive siswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah lingkaran yang ditinjau dari gaya belajar. Jenis penelitian ini adalah deskriptif kualitatif. Subjek penelitian adalah siswa kelas VIII SMPN 1 Pakisaji, Kabupaten Malang. Subjek penelitian sebanyak 3 dengan masing-masing satu siswa dari gaya belajar visual, satu siswa dari gaya belajar auditori, dan satu siswa dari gaya belajar kinestetik. Data penelitian diambil dari angket gaya belajar, tes tulis siswa, dan wawancara. Teknik analisis data pada penelitian ini yaitu reduksi data, penyajian data, dan penarikan kesimpulan. Angket gaya belajar digunakan untuk menentukan kecenderungan gaya belajar siswa, sedangkan tes tulis untuk mengetahui commognitive siswa. Hasil penelitian menunjukan commognitive siswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah pada masing-masing gaya belajar memiliki perbedaan. Siswa dengan gaya belajar visual menyelesaikan masalah dengan menggunakan keempat komponen commognitive yaitu penggunaan kata, mediator visual, narasi, dan rutinitas. Siswa dengan gaya belajar auditorial menyelesaikan masalah dengan menggunakan tiga komponen commognitive yaitu penggunaan kata, narasi, dan rutinitas. Sedangkan siswa dengan gaya belajar kinestetik menggunakan keempat komponen commognitive yaitu penggunaan kata, mediator visual, narasi, dan rutinitas.
Downloads
References
DePorter, B., & Hernacki, M. (2011). Quantum Learning : Membiasakan Belajar Nyaman dan Menyenangakan (1st ed.). Kaifa.
Ho, W. K., Hong, L. S., Tay, E. G., Leong, Y. H., & Ming, K. (2019). Passing a Proof Message : Student-Teacher Communication Through A Commognitive Lens. 42nd Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia Incorporated (MERGA 2019) on “Mathematics Education Research: Impacting Practice” (Pp. 700–706), Adelaide, Australia, 700–706. https://repository.nie.edu.sg/bitstream/10497/21313/1/MERGA-2019-700.pdf
Ishartono, N., Faiziyah, N., Sutarni, S., Putri, A. B., Fatmasari, L. W. S., Sayuti, M.,
Rahmaniati, R., & Yunus, M. M. (2021). Visual, Auditory, and Kinesthetic Students: How They Solve PISA-Oriented Mathematics Problems? Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1720(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1720/1/012012
NCTM. (2000). Principle and Standards for School Mathematics.
NCTM. (2014). NCTM CURRICULUM AND EVALUATION STANDARDS FOR SCHOOL MATHEMATICS : RESPONSES FROM THE RESEARCH. 19(4), 338–344.
Rahman, A., & Ahmar, A. S. (2017). Relationship between learning styles and learning achievement in mathematics based on genders. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 15(1), 74–77. https://doi.org/10.26858/wtetev15i1y2017p7477
Salido, A., & Dasari, D. (2019). Students’ errors in solving probability problems viewed by learning style. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1211(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1211/1/012067
Setiana, D. S., & Purwoko, R. Y. (2020). Analisis kemampuan berpikir kritis ditinjau dari gaya belajar matematika siswa. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 7(2), 163–177. https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jrpm/article/view/34290
Sfard, A. (2001). There is more to discourse than meets the ears: Looking at thinking as communicating to learn more about mathematical learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46(1–3), 13–57. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1014097416157
Sfard, A. (2008). Introduction to Thinking as communicating. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 5(2), 429.
Sfard, A. (2009). Commognition: Thinking as Communicating. Thinking as Communicating, May, 65–93. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511499944.005
Sfard, A. (2012). Introduction: Developing mathematical discourse-Some insights from communicational research. International Journal of Educational Research, 51–52, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2011.12.013
Sfard, A., & Avigail, S. (2007). When the Rules of Discourse Change, but Nobody Tells You: the case of a class learning about negative numbers. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(4), 565–613. http://www.informaworld.com/10.1080/10508400701525253
Sheromova, T. S., Khuziakhmetov, A. N., Kazinets, V. A., Sizova, Z. M., Buslaev, S. I., &
Borodianskaia, E. A. (2020). Learning styles and development of cognitive skills in mathematics learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(11). https://doi.org/10.29333/EJMSTE/8538
Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Sukmadinata, N. S. (2016). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Sulisawati, D. N., Lutfiyah, L., Murtinasari, F., & Sukma, L. (2019). Differences of
Visual, Auditorial, Kinesthetic Students in Understanding Mathematics Problems. Malikussaleh Journal of Mathematics Learning (MJML), 2(2), 45–51. https://doi.org/10.29103/mjml.v2i2.1385
Trizulfianto, T., Anggreini, D., & Waluyo, A. (2017). Analisis Kesulitan Siswa Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Materi Program Linier Berdasarkan Gaya Belajar Siswa. UNION: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 473–484. https://doi.org/10.30738/.v5i2.1229
Usman, M. R., Baharullah, B., & ... (2022). Deskripsi Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Matematis Ditinjau Dari Gaya Belajar Siswa. JURNAL MathEdu …, 5(1), 61–69. http://journal.ipts.ac.id/index.php/MathEdu/article/view/3525%0Ahttps://journal.ipts.ac.id/index.php/MathEdu/article/download/3525/2336
Utami, Y. (2020). Differences in Mathematics Learning Outcomes of Students With High School Level Visual , Auditorial and Kinesthetic Learning Styles. 9(1), 1–5.
Zayyadi, M., Nusantara, T., Subanji, Hidayanto, E., & Sulandra, I. M. (2019). A commognitive framework: The process of solving mathematical problems of middle school students. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(2), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.2.7
Copyright (c) 2022 Sulis Setyowati, Purwanto Purwanto, Sudirman Sudirman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.