Developing STEM Learning Design with Mini Projector Media in Grade V of Elementary School

  • Opi Irmayani Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Dindin Abdul Muiz Lidinillah Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Agnestasia Ramadhani Putri Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Keywords: Learning Design, STEM, EDR, 21th Century Skills

Abstract

The lack of innovation in process engineering and technology-based learning in primary schools results in suboptimal learning outcomes. Primary school education does not involve students directly in every learning process, leading to underdeveloped student competencies. One innovative learning approach that can be utilized by elementary school teachers is STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) education. The objective of this research is to develop a STEM learning design product to make primary school education more meaningful. The research method employed is Educational Design Research (EDR), which consists of three phases: analysis and exploration, design and construction, and evaluation and reflection. Data collection techniques include interviews, observations, documentary studies, and questionnaires. The subjects of this research are students from classes VB and VC at SDN 2 Pengadilan Kota Tasikmalaya. After conducting two trials of the STEM learning design, it was found that the developed learning design is valid, practical, and suitable for use in primary schools. STEM education can serve as an alternative for teachers to implement learning processes that involve engineering and technology, thus meeting the demands of 21st-century skills for students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afiyanti, Y. (2008). Focus Group Discussion (Diskusi Kelompok Terfokus) Sebagai Metode Pengumpulan Data Penelitian Kualitatif. Jurnal KeperAwatan Indonesia, 12(1), 58–62. https://doi.org/10.7454/JKI.V12I1.201

Artobatama, I., Hamdu, G., & Giyartini, R. (2020). Analisis Desain Pembelajaran STEM berdasarkan Kemampuan 4C di SD. Indonesian Journal of Primary Education, 4(1), 76–86. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijpe.v4i1.24530

Baber, L. D. B. (2015). Considering the interest-convergence dilemma in STEM education. Review of Higher Education, 38(2), 251–270. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2015.0004

Blackley, S., & Howell, J. (2015). A STEM narrative: 15 years in the making. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(7), 102–112. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2015v40n7.8

Breiner, J. M., Harkness, S. S., Johnson, C. C., & Koehler, C. M. (2012). What Is STEM? A Discussion About Conceptions of STEM in Education and Partnerships. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00109.x

Brown, J. (2012). The current status of STEM education research. Journal of STEM Education, 13(5), 7–12.

Bunyamin, Mu. A. H. (2015). Pendidikan STEM Bersepadu : Perspektif Global , Perkembangan Semasa di Malaysia. The Bulletin of the Johor Association of Science and Mathematics Education, 25(1)(November 2015), 1–6.

Bybee, R. W. (2013). The Case for Education: STEM Challenges and Opportunities. NSTA (National Science Teachers Assocation), 33–40. www.nsta.org/permissions.

Chatib, M. (2016). Gurunya Manusia (Menjadikan Semua Anak Istimewa dan Semua Anak Juara). PT Mizan Pustaka.

Chen, M. (2001). A Potential Limitation of Embedded-Teaching for Formal Learning. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 23(23), 276–281.

Chesky, N. Z., & Wolfmeyer, M. R. (2015). Philosophy of STEM Education. In Philosophy
of STEM Education. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137535467

Cunningham, C. M. (2018). Engineering in Elementary STEM Education (Curriculum Design, Instruction, Learning, and Assessment). Teachers College Press.

Dugger, W. E. (2010). Evolution of STEM in the United States. 6Th Biennial International Conference on Technology Education Research, March, 1–8. http://www.iteea.org/Resources/PressRoom/AustraliaPaper.pdf

Hamdu, G., Karlimah, & Nursyarifah, F. (2016). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Sebagai Implementasi Kurikurikulum 2013. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Sains, 375–380.

Hanafi. (2017). Konsep Penelitian R&D Dalam Bidang Pendidikan. Jurnal Kajian Keislaman, 4(2), 129–150. http://www.aftanalisis.com

Haryati, T., Lidinillah, D, A, M., K. (2020). Development of the STEM Learning Design in the 2013 Curriculum in Primary Schools: An Analysis and Exploration. Jurnal Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar, 3(2), 71–78.

Hosnan, M. (2014). Pendekatan Saintifik dan Kontekstual dalam Pembelajaran Abad 21. Ghalia Indonesia.

Katehi, L., Pearson, G., & Feder, M. (2009). Engineering in K-12 education: Understanding the status and improving the prospects. In Engineering in K-12 Education: Understanding the Status and Improving the Prospects. https://doi.org/10.17226/12635

Kemendikbudristek. (2022). Buku Saku: Tanya Jawab Kurikulum Merdeka. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset Dan Teknologi, Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset Dan Teknologi, 9–46. http://repositori.kemdikbud.go.id/id/eprint/25344

Khoiriyah, N., Abdurrahman, A., & Wahyudi, I. (2018). Implementasi pendekatan pembelajaran STEM untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa SMA pada materi gelombang bunyi. Jurnal Riset Dan Kajian Pendidikan Fisika, 5(2), 53. https://doi.org/10.12928/jrkpf.v5i2.9977

Lidinillah, D. A. M., Mulyana, E. H., Karlimah, K., & Hamdu, G. (2019). Integration of
STEM learning into the elementary curriculum in Indonesia: An analysis and exploration. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1318(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1318/1/012053

Mann, E. L., Mann, R. L., Strutz, M. L., Duncan, D., & Yoon, S. Y. (2011). Integrating Engineering Into K-6 Curriculum: Developing Talent in the STEM Disciplines. Journal of Advanced Academics, 22(4), 639–658. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X11415007

Matthew B. Miles, A. Michael Huberman, J. S. (2016). Qualitative Data Analysis A Methods Sourcebook. Arizona State University, 30(25), 33. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns.30.25.33.s40

Musnidar, L. (2018). Pengaruh Penerapan Pembelajaran STEM (Science, Technology,
Engineering, Mathematics) terhadap Keterampilan Creatif Problem Solving dan Komunikasi Siswa. Prosiding SEMNAS MIPA IV, 174–179. https://conference.usk.ac.id/SN-MIPA/4

Oktapiani, N., & Hamdu, G. (2020). Desain Pembelajaran STEM berdasarkan Kemampuan 4C di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 7(2), 99. https://doi.org/10.30659/pendas.7.2.99-108

Peraturan Pemerintah RI. (2013). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 32 Tahun 2013 Pasal 1 Ayat 16 tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan.

Roberts, A., & Cantu, D. (2012). Applying STEM Instructional Strategies to Design and Technology Curriculum. Technology Education in the 21st Century, 111–118. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:533285/fulltext01.pdf%2523page=81#page=111

Sanders, M. (2009). STEM,STEMEducation,STEMmania. The Technology Teacher, 68(4), 20–27. https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/bitstream/handle/10919/51616/STEMmania.pdf?
sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Sugiyono. (2021). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Sulistia, S., Lidinillah, D. A. M., Nugraha, A., & Karlimah, K. (2019). Promoting engineering for fourth-grade students through STEM learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1318(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1318/1/012054
Published
2023-08-18
How to Cite
Irmayani, O., Lidinillah, D., & Putri, A. (2023). Developing STEM Learning Design with Mini Projector Media in Grade V of Elementary School. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(3), 2688-2702. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v7i3.2680
Share |