The Impact of Synchronous Online Learning on Students Attainment in Maths

  • Disa Evawani Lestari President University
  • Purnama Dewi President University
Keywords: matematika, pencapaian siswa, pembelajaran sinkron, pembelajaran tatap muka

Abstract

Akibat munculnya pandemi Covid-19, banyak sekolah di Indonesia yang menerapkan sekolah dari rumah di mana guru dan siswa harus belajar dari rumah, termasuk di sekolah dasar. Berdasarkan fakta tersebut, tak pelak, guru dan siswa ditantang untuk melakukan pembelajaran daring sinkron. Oleh karena itu, tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis pengaruh pembelajaran online sinkron terhadap prestasi belajar matematika siswa. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode triangulasi yang dapat membantu dalam mengkonfirmasikan kumpulan temuan berdasarkan hipotesis. Untuk memenuhi tujuan tersebut, 16 siswa kelas 4 SD di Jakarta direkrut sebagai peserta penelitian. Data dikumpulkan dari nilai akhir mata pelajaran matematika siswa di semester-1 (tatap muka) dan semester-2 (pembelajaran online sinkron), serta hasil observasi peserta selama 3 bulan pada semester-2 (pembelajaran online sinkron). Berdasarkan perhitungan analisis menggunakan aplikasi SPSS, Paired Sample T-Test menunjukkan nilai sig. (2-tailed) sebesar 0,014. Hasil 0,014 berada di bawah 0,05 yang berarti pembelajaran online sinkron telah menyebabkan penurunan yang signifikan pada hasil belajar matematika siswa dibandingkan dengan pembelajaran tatap muka. Faktor yang bisa mempengaruhi pencapaian siswa adalah kesiapan siswa dalam menggunakan teknologi dan media, manajemen waktu, kondisi fisik dan mental siswa terhadap pembelajaran online dan fokus diskusi.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amry, A., B. (2014). The impact of whatsapp mobile social learning on the achievement and attitudes of female students compared with face to face learning in the classroom. European Scientific Journal, 20(22), 116-136.

Choi, J., & Walters, A. (2018). Exploring the impact of small-group synchronous discourse sessions in online math learning. Online Learning, 22(4), 47-64. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i4.1511

Coogle, C., & Floyd, K. (2015). Synchronous and asynchronous learning environments of rural graduate early childhood special educators utilizing Wimba© and Ecampus. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 11(2).

Croxton, R. A. (2014). The role of interactivity in student satisfaction and persistence in online learning. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10 (2), 314.

Dhilla, S. J. (2017). The role of online faculty in supporting successful online learning enterprises: A literature review. Higher Education Politics & Economics, 3(1), 3.

Fryer, L. K., Larson-Hall, J., & Stewart, J. (2018). Quantitative methodology. The Palgrave Handbook of Applied Linguistics Research Methodology,55–77. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59900-1_3

Gambari, A. I., Yusuf, H. T., & Balogun, S. A. (2015). Effectiveness of PowerPoint presentation on students' sognitive schievement in technical drawing. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 3(4), 1-12.

Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. E. (2011). Applied thematic analysis. SAGE Publications, Inc.

Hart, C. (2012). Factors associated with student persistence in an online program of study: A review of the literature. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 11(1).

Hoang, D., Naderi, E., Cheng, R., Aryana, B. (2019). Adopting immersive technologies for design practice: the internal and external barriers. International Conference on Engineering

Design (ICED19), Delft. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.196

Kauffman, H. (2015). A review of predictive factors of student success in and satisfaction with online learning. Research in Learning Technology, 23.
https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v23.26507

Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2020, March 26). Kemendikbud bekerja sama dengan operator telekomunikasi sukseskan pembelajaran di rumah. https://www.kemdikbud.go.id /main/blog/2020/03/kemendikbud-bekerja-sama-dengan- operator-telekomunikasi-sukseskan- pembelajaran-di-rumah

Kemp, N., & Grieve, R. (2014). Face-to-face or face-to-screen? Undergraduates' opinions and test performance in classroom vs. online learning. Frontiers in psychology, 5, 1278, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01278

Loeb, S. (March, 2020). How effective is online learning? what the research does and doesn't tell us. https://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2020/03/23/ howeffective-is-online-learningwhat- the.html

Lowrie, T., & Logan, T. (2018). The interaction between spatial reasoning constructs and mathematics understandings in elementary classrooms. Research in Mathematics
Education, 253-276. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98767-5_12

Noble, H., & Heale, R. (2019). Triangulation in research, with examples. Evidence Based Nursing, 22(3), 67-68. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebnurs-2019-103145

McGilvray, K. C. (2014). An analysis of student preparedness factors that aid in satisfaction and retention in online courses and programs [Doctoral dissertation, University of Toledo]. ETD OhioLink. https://etd.ohiolink.edu/rws_etd/send_file/send?accession=toledo1396452179&disp osition=inline

McKeever, B., W. (2019). Different formats, equal outcomes? comparing in-person and online education in public relations. Journal of Public Relations Education, 5 (2), 1-40.

Muzammil, M., Sutawijaya, A., & Harsasi, M. (2019). Student satisfaction in online learning: can student engagement becomes driving factor based on student interaction?. International Open & Distance Learning Conference,91-97.

Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2013). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y

Queirós, A., Faria, D., & Almeida, F. (2017). Strengths and limitations of qualitative and quantitative research methods. European Journal of Education Studie, 3(9), 369-387. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.887089

Somenarain, L., Akkaraju, S., & Gharbaran, R. (2010). Student perceptions and learning outcomes in asynchronous and synchronous online learning environment in a Biology course. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 3(2), 353-356.

Stojanov, Z. (2016). Inductive approaches in software process assessment. International Conference on Applied Internet and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.20544/AIIT2016.I01

UNICEF Indonesia. (2020, June 16). Indonesia: Survei terbaru menunjukkan bagaimana siswa belajar dari rumah. https://www.unicef.org/indonesia/id/press-releases/indonesia-survei- terbaru-menunjukkan-bagaimana-siswa-belajar-dari-rumah
Published
2021-04-09
How to Cite
Lestari, D., & Dewi, P. (2021). The Impact of Synchronous Online Learning on Students Attainment in Maths. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 867-879. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v5i2.408
Share |