Investigasi Kesulitan Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah HOTS Matematika

  • Salsabila Nur Faizzah Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
  • Sri Sutarni Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
Keywords: HOTS, Kesulitan, Matematika

Abstract

Masih banyak ditemukan siswa yang kesulitan dalam menyelesaikan masalah HOTS, padahal masalah tersebut banyak digunakan sebagai asesmen untuk mengukur kemampuan matematis siswa. Berdasarkan masalah tersebut, penelitian ini bertujuan mengidentifikasi kesulitan siswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah HOTS. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah kualitatif dengan desain fenomenologi. Menggunakan teknik purposive sampling untuk menentukan subjek penelitian dan diperoleh 3 siswa sebagai subjek penelitian. Data diperoleh menggunakan tes, wawancara, dan observasi, sehingga memerlukan instrumen tes berupa masalah HOTS dan instrumen non tes meliputi pedoman wawancara dan lembar observasi. Keabsahan data pada penelitian ini menggunakan triangulasi metode dan triangulasi teori. Teknik induktif digunakan pada penelitian ini untuk menganalisis data penelitian. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan kesulitan siswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah HOTS ini disebabkan karena kesulitan dalam mematimatisasi dan memahami masalah, kesalahan dalam penerapan formula dalam memecahkan masalah HOTS. Faktor lain meliputi kurangnya latihan soal HOTS, kecemasan siswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah, sumber buku yang digunakan tidak efektif, dan seringnya guru memberikan masalah rutin daripada non rutin.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdullah, A. H., Nurarfah, S., & Rahman, S. A. (2017). Metacognitive-skills-of-Malaysian-students-in-nonroutine-mathematical-problem-solvingBolema--Mathematics-Education-Bulletin.pdf. Bolema: Boletim de Educação Matemática, 31(57), 310–322. https://doi.org/: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1980-4415v31n57a15

Agusta, E. S. (2020). Peningkatan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika melalui Model Pembelajaran Berbasis HOTS. Jurnal Riset Pembelajaran Matematika Sekolah, 4(1), 58–64. https://doi.org/10.21009/jrpms.041.09

Alqurashi, E. (2019). Predicting student satisfaction and perceived learning within online learning environments. Distance Education, 40(1), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1553562

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assesing; A revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Education Objectives. Addison Wesley Lonman Inc.

Asnawi, K. U., Konghoiro, I., Kartasasmita, S., Subroto, U., Pautina, A. R., Nor Shafrin, A., Ibad, I. D. I., Ratu, B., Literate, S., Indonesia, J. I., Fathadhika, S.,
Afriani, -, & Widuri, E. L. (2018). Intervensi kaunseling dalam menangani kemarahan murid sekolah. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, 3(1), 57–66. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/empati/article/view/23587%0Ahttp://jurnal.unpad.ac.id/jpsp/article/view/18741%0Ahttp://jurnal.untad.ac.id/jurnal/index.php/Kreatif/article/download/3349/2385%0Ahttps://dachun91.wordpress.com/2012/03/13/terapi-psikol

Badjeber, R., & Purwaningrum, J. P. (2018). Pengembangan Higher Order Thinking Skills Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Di Smp. Guru Tua : Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 1(1), 36–43. https://doi.org/10.31970/gurutua.v1i1.9

Chou, H. C., Tung, N. L., & Ng Mou Kehn, M. (2018). The Double-Focus Generalized Luneburg Lens Design and Synthesis Using Metasurfaces. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 66(9), 4936–4941. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAP.2018.2845550

Creswell, J. W. (2015). Educational Research - Planning, COnducting, And Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research - Fifth Edition. In AORN Journal (Vol. 62, Issue 1).

Emden, M., Weber, K., & Sumfleth, E. (2018). Evaluating a learning progression on “Transformation of Matter” on the lower secondary level. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(4), 1096–1116. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8rp00137e

Febriyanti, D. S., Hamdani, H., & Sabri, T. (2022). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Kelas Iv Sd Menyelesaikan Soal Kpk Dan Fpb Berdasarkan Prosedur Newman. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa (JPPK), 11(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.26418/jppk.v11i1.52075

Gupta, T., & Mishra, L. (2021). Higher-Order Thinking Skills in Shaping the Future of Students. Psychology and Education, 58(2), 9305–9311. www.psychologyandeducation.net

Halik, A., Wardah Hanafie Das, S., Aswad, M., Syakir Rady, M., Dangnga, M. S., &
Nasir, M. S. (2019). Empowerment of school committee in improving education service quality at public primary school in Parepare city. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(9), 1956–1963. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.070915

Margot, K. C., & Kettler, T. (2019). Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: a systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM
Education, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0151-2

Muslim, M., Ikhsan, M., & Fuadi, A. (2018). Student difficulties in solving high
order thinking skills (HOTS) problem on geometry problems viewed from the cognitive styles. Proceeding of The 8th Annual International Conference (AIC) on Social Sciences, 8(1), 310–315. https://jurnal.usk.ac.id/AICS-Social/article/view/12956/0

Palapasari, R., Kadir, & Anggo, M. (2017). Pengaruh Penerapan Konstruktivis Realistik Dan Kemampuan Dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(1), 46–56.

Pratama, G. S., & Retnawati, H. (2018). Urgency of Higher Order Thinking Skills
(HOTS) Content Analysis in Mathematics Textbook. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1097(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012147

Purbaningrum, K. A. (2017). Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Siswa Smp
Dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau Dari Gaya Belajar. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran Matematika, 10(2), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.30870/jppm.v10i2.2029

Rahmawati, F., & Retnawati, H. (2019). An Analysis of Students’ Difficulties in Solving PISA-like Mathematical Problems. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1200(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1200/1/012015

Rowsell, J. (2013). Working with multimodality: Rethinking literacy in a digital age. Working with Multimodality: Rethinking Literacy in a Digital Age, 1–173. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203071953

Sari, N. M. (2020). Analisis Kesulitan Siswa dalam Mengerjakan Soal Matematika Materi Perbandingan Kelas VII SMP Luhur Baladika. Jurnal Equation: Teori Dan Penelitian Pendidikan Matematika, 3(1), 22–33. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.29300/equation.v3i1.2653

Shernoff, D. J., Sinha, S., Bressler, D. M., & Ginsburg, L. (2017). Assessing teacher education and professional development needs for the implementation of integrated approaches to STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 4(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0068-1

Suwarno, S., Nusantara, T., Susiswo, S., & Irawati, S. (2022). The decision making strategy of prospective mathematics teachers in improving LOTS to be HOTS problem. Int. J. Nonlinear Anal. Appl, 13(1), 1613–1627. http://dx.doi.org/10.22075/ijnaa.2022.5776

Tanujaya, B. (2017). Application of Assessment as Learning in Mathematics Instruction. 100, 140–145. https://doi.org/10.2991/seadric-17.2017.30

Umam, K., & Susandi, A. D. (2023). Analysis of difficulties of junior high school students in solving AKM numeration problems. International Journal of Trends in Mathematics Education Research (IJTMER), 6(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33122/ijtmer.v6i1.171

Widana, I. W. (2018). Higher Order Thinking Skills Assessment towards Critical Thinking on Mathematics Lesson. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (IJSSH), 2(1), 24–32. https://doi.org/10.29332/ijssh.v2n1.74

Wulandari, Dantes, N., & Antara, P. A. (2020). Pendekatan Pendidikan Matematika Realistik Berbasis Open Ended Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa [Open Ended-Based Realistic Mathematics Education Approach to Students’ Mathematical Problem Solving Ability]. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 4(2), 131–142.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v4i2.25103

Yadav, A., Mayfield, C., Zhou, N., Hambrusch, S., & Korb, J. T. (2014). Computational thinking in elementary and secondary teacher education. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1145/2576872

Yaniawati, R. P., Indrawan, R., & Setiawan, G. (2019). Core model on improving mathematical communication and connection, analysis of students’ mathematical disposition. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 639–654. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12441a

Zainuddin, Z., Habiburrahim, Muluk, S., & Keumala, C. M. (2019). How do students become self-directed learners in the EFL flipped-class pedagogy? A study in higher education. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(3), 678–690. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v8i3.15270

Zulfa, H., Saputro, D. R. S., & Riyadi, R. (2018). Analysis of difficulties in mathematics learning on students with deictic gesture type in problem-solving HOTS algebra test. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1108(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1108/1/012074
Published
2023-07-10
How to Cite
Faizzah, S., & Sutarni, S. (2023). Investigasi Kesulitan Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah HOTS Matematika. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(2), 1963-1975. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v7i2.2438
Share |