Strategi Metakognitif Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Sistem persamaan Linear Dua Variabel Ditinjau Berdasarkan Kecemasan Matematika
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan strategi metakognitif siswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah ditinjau dari kecemasan matematika. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian deskriptif dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan angket kecemasan matematika, tes dan wawancara. Subjek penelitian adalah peserta didik kelas IX SMPN 3 Sampang. Data yang didapatkan kemudian direduksi dan dianalisis secara kualitatif dengan memperhatikan indikator-indikator strategi metakognitif siswa. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa siswa dengan kecemasan matematika rendah mampu melakukan tahapn strategi metakognitif dengan sangat baik. Sedangkan untuk siswa dengan tingkat kecemasan tinggi, mereka tidak dapat melakukan strategi metakognitifnya dengan baik. Bagi peneliti selanjutnya, agar meneliti faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi rendahnya strategi metakognitif siswa pada jenjang SMA/sederajat.
Downloads
References
Beach, P., Henderson, G., & McConnel, J. (2020). Elementary teachers’ cognitive processes and metacognitive strategies during self-directed online learning. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 26(5–6), 395–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2020.1863206
Colombo, B., & Antonietti, A. (2017). The Role of Metacognitive Strategies in Learning Music: A Multiple Case Study. British Journal of Music Education, 34(1), 95–113. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265051716000267
de Boer, H., Donker, A. S., Kostons, D. D. N. M., & van der Werf, G. P. C. (2018a). Long-term effects of metacognitive strategy instruction on student academic performance: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 24, 98–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.03.002
de Boer, H., Donker, A. S., Kostons, D. D. N. M., & van der Werf, G. P. C. (2018b). Long-term effects of metacognitive strategy instruction on student academic performance: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 24, 98–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.03.002
Farida, D., & Ali, M. (2006). Pengaruh Strategi Metakognitif Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa Kelas Viii Di Smp Negeri 6. Journal.Student.Uny.Ac.Id, 19–27.
Garofalo, J., & Lester, F. K. (2014). Cognitive and Mathematical. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 16(3), 163–176.
Magiera, M. T., & Zawojewski, J. S. (2011). Characterizations of social-based and self-based contexts associated with students’awareness, evaluation,and regulation of their thinking during small-group mathematical modeling. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 42(5), 486–520. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.42.5.0486
Main, L. F., Delcourt, M. A. B., & Treffinger, D. J. (2019). Effects of Group Training in Problem-Solving Style on Future Problem-Solving Performance. Journal of Creative Behavior, 53(3), 274–285. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.176
Nengsih, L. W., Susiswo, S., & Sa’dijah, C. (2019). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa Sekolah Dasar dengan Gaya Kognitif Field Dependent. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 4(2), 143. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v4i2.11927
Østefjells, T., Melle, I., Aminoff, S. R., Hellvin, T., Hagen, R., Lagerberg, T. V., Lystad, J.
U., & Røssberg, J. I. (2017). An exploration of metacognitive beliefs and thought control strategies in bipolar disorder. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 73, 84–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2016.11.008
Rieser, S., Naumann, A., Decristan, J., Fauth, B., Klieme, E., & Büttner, G. (2016). The connection between teaching and learning: Linking teaching quality and metacognitive strategy use in primary school. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(4), 526–545. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12121
Risnanosanti. (2008). MELATIH KEMAMPUAN METAKOGNITIF SISWA DALAM PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA. Semnas Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika 2008, 115–123.
Rizki, F., Rafianti, I., & Marethi, I. (2019). Pengaruh Kecemasan Matematika terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa di SMA. GAUSS: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(2), 11. https://doi.org/10.30656/gauss.v2i2.1750
Siegel, M. A. (2012). Filling in the Distance Between Us: Group Metacognition During Problem Solving in a Secondary Education Course. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(3), 325–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9326-z
Sophianingtyas, F., & Sugiarto, B. (2013). Identifikasi Level Metakognitif dalam Memecahkan Masalah Materi Perhitungan Kimia. UNESA Journal of Chemical Education, 2(1), 21–27.
Syahbana, A. (2013). Edumatica Volume 03 Nomor 02. 03(1995), 1–12.
Wilson, J., & Clarke, D. (2004). Towards the modelling of mathematical metacognition. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 16(2), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217394
Yang, C., & Bai, L. (2019). The use of metacognitive strategies by Chinese PhD students of social sciences in Australian universities. International Journal of Educational Research, 97(September 2018), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.06.007
Živković, M., Pellizzoni, S., Mammarella, I. C., & Passolunghi, M. C. (2022). Executive functions, math anxiety and math performance in middle school students. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, July 2021, 438–452. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12412
Copyright (c) 2023 Linda Ramadhanty Januar, Purwanto Purwanto, Susiswo Susiswo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.